Here are my gameplay ideas for KSA.
Below, I’ve divided them into separate blocks so you can comment on each one more easily,
so feel free to do so!
Problem:
Many space-building games struggle to balance freedom with purpose. Players often enjoy building rockets and experimenting, but without a structured sense of progress or real consequences, motivation tends to fade after the early stages. At the same time, once a player achieves basic orbital capability, gameplay can feel repetitive without new layers of challenge or discovery. There is a need for a gameplay structure that offers both direction and long-term depth, connecting engineering, exploration, and science into one cohesive experience.
Why it matters:
A mission-based structure with layered objectives allows players to naturally progress from simple launches to complex interplanetary operations. Combining that structure with data-driven exploration systems ensures that every mission produces useful knowledge or technological growth. This creates a satisfying gameplay rhythm: build → test → discover → improve → expand.
Proposed Solution:
A. Main Progression Line
This is the narrative and technological backbone of the game. Each mission group represents a major phase in humanity’s expansion into space:
Each milestone unlocks new mission tiers, technologies, and logistical challenges. Progression is not only about completing objectives but about developing the infrastructure to support them.
B. Research and Development Contracts
Science-oriented missions reward research points that can be used to unlock or enhance parts and systems. For example, advanced fuel systems, atmospheric engines, or modular heat shields could be tied to specific discoveries. These contracts encourage experimentation, as players can test components under different conditions and expand their engineering capabilities.
C. Economic Contracts
A financial gameplay layer adds realism and strategic planning.
This economy mirrors the logic of modern aerospace programs: investing in reusability, optimization, and iterative design yields long-term benefits.
To adapt to these challenges, players rely on scientific instruments that gather environmental data and inform engineering decisions:
The collected data becomes a tangible gameplay resource: it informs design choices, unlocks research upgrades, and gradually builds a planetary database. For example, studying extreme heat environments could unlock a new engine variant capable of surviving higher thermal loads. Players who invest in exploration tools will gain long-term advantages, making later missions safer and more efficient.
Together, these systems form a self-sustaining gameplay loop. Missions drive exploration; exploration produces data; data fuels research and unlocks better components, which in turn enable more ambitious missions. This design merges the creative freedom of a sandbox with the structure and satisfaction of a long-term progression game — where knowledge and preparation are the ultimate resources.
Below, I’ve divided them into separate blocks so you can comment on each one more easily,
so feel free to do so!
Problem:
Many space-building games struggle to balance freedom with purpose. Players often enjoy building rockets and experimenting, but without a structured sense of progress or real consequences, motivation tends to fade after the early stages. At the same time, once a player achieves basic orbital capability, gameplay can feel repetitive without new layers of challenge or discovery. There is a need for a gameplay structure that offers both direction and long-term depth, connecting engineering, exploration, and science into one cohesive experience.
Why it matters:
A mission-based structure with layered objectives allows players to naturally progress from simple launches to complex interplanetary operations. Combining that structure with data-driven exploration systems ensures that every mission produces useful knowledge or technological growth. This creates a satisfying gameplay rhythm: build → test → discover → improve → expand.
Proposed Solution:
- Mission-Based Gameplay Structure
The gameplay revolves around a system of contracts divided into three major categories:
A. Main Progression Line
This is the narrative and technological backbone of the game. Each mission group represents a major phase in humanity’s expansion into space:
- Launch and recovery of the first orbital satellite
- Construction of the first orbital station (similar to the ISS)
- Establishment of the first planetary colony within the solar system
- Creation of a modular orbital shipyard for rocket assembly in space – to complete this milestone, the player must build an orbital station that meets specific technical requirements, such as a minimum number of docking ports, sufficient electrical power generation from solar or alternative sources (for example, nuclear), and stable structural integrity for heavy vehicle assembly.
- Development of the first interstellar colony outside the solar system
Each milestone unlocks new mission tiers, technologies, and logistical challenges. Progression is not only about completing objectives but about developing the infrastructure to support them.
B. Research and Development Contracts
Science-oriented missions reward research points that can be used to unlock or enhance parts and systems. For example, advanced fuel systems, atmospheric engines, or modular heat shields could be tied to specific discoveries. These contracts encourage experimentation, as players can test components under different conditions and expand their engineering capabilities.
C. Economic Contracts
A financial gameplay layer adds realism and strategic planning.
- Fixed-Budget Contracts: missions with a defined cost ceiling. Any unspent funds become profit, incentivizing efficient designs and operations.
- Recurring Transport Contracts: long-term missions like cargo or passenger routes between two points. Profit depends on minimizing costs over time. This system simulates the management of a space company, where efficiency and reliability determine financial success. Earned money can fund research, facility upgrades, or future missions.
This economy mirrors the logic of modern aerospace programs: investing in reusability, optimization, and iterative design yields long-term benefits.
- Functional Gameplay Systems and Deep Space Exploration
After completing the main storyline, gameplay transitions into open-ended exploration. Each celestial body has unique environmental parameters that affect mission planning — gravity strength, atmospheric density and composition, surface temperature, and terrain elevation. These properties determine how challenging a landing or construction mission will be.
To adapt to these challenges, players rely on scientific instruments that gather environmental data and inform engineering decisions:
- Orbital radar scanners map planetary surfaces, highlighting smooth landing areas and regions of scientific interest.
- Atmospheric probes collect density, pressure, and composition data, helping players calibrate engines, parachutes, and heat shields for safe entry and descent.
- Thermal sensors measure temperature fluctuations, allowing optimization of radiators, fuel tanks, and materials for extreme environments.
- Gravitometers and seismic sensors reveal local gravity anomalies and underground structures, useful for stable base placement or resource prospecting.
- Spectrographic analyzers identify the chemical composition of terrain and potential resource deposits for mining and manufacturing.
The collected data becomes a tangible gameplay resource: it informs design choices, unlocks research upgrades, and gradually builds a planetary database. For example, studying extreme heat environments could unlock a new engine variant capable of surviving higher thermal loads. Players who invest in exploration tools will gain long-term advantages, making later missions safer and more efficient.
Together, these systems form a self-sustaining gameplay loop. Missions drive exploration; exploration produces data; data fuels research and unlocks better components, which in turn enable more ambitious missions. This design merges the creative freedom of a sandbox with the structure and satisfaction of a long-term progression game — where knowledge and preparation are the ultimate resources.
Upvote
0